I am totally open to changing my mind on this passage but I do currently think this is the right way to understand it and I didn't come to this opinion rashly.
My research project on the topic of women in ministry and related issues is going to start once I'm done teaching through the Gospel of Mark (probably less than two months from now) and I hope I can offer real clarity on all this stuff. I know how important the issue is and how important it is that we strip away confusion and truly follow what God is telling us.
In this episode of the Radically Christian Podcast, Wes McAdams joins Austin McCrickard and Nate Miller on their show The Thinking Kingdom Podcast to discuss 1 Corinthians 13 (often called the “love chapter”). They focus particularly on verse 10, where Paul says, “When the perfect comes, the partial will pass away.” The conversation explores what Paul meant by “the perfect,” how the passage fits within the larger context of 1 Corinthians 12–14, and how Christians today should understand spiritual gifts in light of love being the ultimate goal.
Wes explains that the Corinthian church had been divided and worldly, using their spiritual gifts—such as prophecy and tongues—for self-promotion rather than for the common good. Paul’s corrective was to teach a “cruciform way of thinking,” where love, not power or eloquence, defines spiritual maturity. Extraordinary gifts were temporary, serving a purpose in the early church, but love, faith, and hope endure. Paul’s message, Wes argues, is not about when or how gifts will cease, but about how Christians must use their gifts in love and unity.
Wes concludes that regardless of how someone interprets, “the perfect,” Paul’s point remains: love is the measure of Christian maturity. He cautions against forcing passages to say what we want merely to guard against theological extremes, noting that the Spirit equips each generation according to its needs, and the permanence of love outlasts all temporary gifts.
Using Our Spiritual Gifts - we look at how God has blessed us each with spiritual gifts, and we outline 4 steps we can take to put those gifts to work. = 1 Corinthians 12
Using Our Spiritual Giftswe look at how God has blessed us each with spiritual gifts, and we outline 4 steps we can take to put those gifts to work.1 Corinthians 12
Imitating Jesus - we talk about the perfect example of Jesus and how He is: forgiving, peaceful, a teacher, selfless, and obedient. 1 Corinthians 11
THOUGHTS ON WOMEN WEARING A HEAD COVERING DURING WORSHIP
A BRIEF STUDY OF 1 CORINTHIANS 11:3-16
1 Corinthians 11:3-16 is a very difficult
passage and widely varying views come from very sincere people forming opposing
ideas about it. Because of this passage some have demanded that women wear some
kind of covering in worship services. After careful study of this passage
others feel perfectly free to allow women to worship without a covering. This
study makes an attempt to understand the language of this passage. (Quotations
are from the NKJV.)
3 But I want you to know that the head of every man
is Christy the head of woman is manf and the head of Christ is God.
The basic subject of the passage is
authority: God is the head of Christ; Christ is the head of man; man is the
head of woman.
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head
covered, dishonors his head.
Man should not use a covering
when teaching or praying. Removing the covering (hat, cap, etc.) is a sign of
respect in the presence of a superior.
5 But every woman who prays or prophesies with her
head uncovered dishonors her head, for that is one and the same as if her head were shaved.
The problem of the woman's uncovered head
is not disrespect for God but disrespect for man (husband). This is also very
clear in verse 7. That was true in the culture of Corinth in the first century,
but it is not true in 21st century America. THIS FACT IS THE KEY TO PROPERLY
UNDERSTANDING THIS PASSAGE.
6 For if a woman is not covered, let her also be
shorn. But if it is shameful for a woman to be shorn or shaved, let her be covered.
In the culture in Corinth a woman praying
or prophesying without a covering was as shameful as a woman with a shaved
head. A shaved head has been a sign of disgrace in most societies.
7For a man indeed
ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman
is the glory of
man.
8For man is not from
woman, but woman from man.
9Nor was man created
for the woman, but woman for the man.
This is a further discussion of man being
the head of the woman, again giving emphasis to the fact that the problem of a
covering is between man and woman, not between woman and God. If, in today's
culture there is no disrespect shown by a woman toward her husband, or other
men, if she does not have a head covering there is no problem in her
worshipping without one.
10For this reason the woman ought to have a symbol
of authority on her head, because of the angels. This is a very
difficult verse and has received much and varied commentary. Some have
suggested that angels are somehow offended or tempted by viewing the uncovered
heads of
women. Some have suggested that this introduces an additional authority (the
first was the
authority of the man) to which women must submit. It is best to connect this
verse with the next
two verses, to see the full context. Angels have to be in submission to God, so
it is good for
them to observe women being submissive to their husbands.
11,12 Nevertheless, neither is man
independent of woman, nor woman independent of man, in the Lord. For as woman
came from man, even so man also comes through woman; but all things are from
God. Great care must be exercised when the subject of woman's subjection to
man is discussed. It is very easy for men to become abusive in this area. This is not a question of intellectual, or
even spiritual, superiority. Spiritually,
men and women come to God on equal terms (Gal. 3:26-28; 1 Pet. 3:7 - note the discussion of submission in verses 1-6).
It is a question of leadership. Men and women depend on each other: God created
woman from man's rib, but men are born of women. Both men and women must
ultimately respect each other, and both must respect God.
13Judge among yourselves. Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head
uncovered? Worshippers
must give consideration to this matter. It was obvious in the Corinthian
setting that it was improper for a woman to worship without a covering on her
head. In modern assemblies it is
certainly possible for this to be permissible because there is no such current
custom, thus, no problem is involved.
14Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair,
it is a dishonor to him?
It is natural for man to have shorter hair than women. The
distinction is in the comparative lengths of the hair. The question involved in
verses 14 and 15 is not "how long is long," which can vary from
culture to culture, but "Is there a distinctive difference between the
lengths of men's and women's hair?
15 But
if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her; for her hair is given to her
for a covering.
Some have believed this verse
says that the whole matter of a woman's covering in worship is satisfied by the
fact that she has long hair. Most understand that there are two coverings in
this passage, one natural and the other external and additional.
16 But
if anyone seems to
be contentious, we have no such custom, nor do the churches of God.
This is very important. This
subject should not be allowed to create contention in churches. If a woman
lives in a culture that demands a covering she should accept it and not cause
contention. If she lives in a culture that does not demand it, but still wants
to wear a covering, she, and others, should not cause contention. If it is a
culture that shows respect in other ways no one should be contentious in
demanding a covering. The word "custom" in verse 16 is difficult
because it is not specifically defined. Many have said that it refers to not
wearing a covering. However, this makes the language awkward because the focus
of the passage has been on wearing a covering. If "custom" refers to
wearing a covering this verse appears to make the whole discussion useless.
Paul may have discussed the whole matter to encourage a practice in Corinth
without binding a law on all churches in all cultures. From chapter 5 to the
end of the letter there is an awareness of the impact of one Christian's
actions on another. This section fits well in that pattern. A practice may be
acceptable in some situations without being binding in every situation.
Three final notes:
1.Some
have concluded that a woman should not cut her hair. Nothing in this passage
suggests that. Verses 5 and 6 say "shaving" the head is a sign of
"shame," but say nothing about cutting or trimming the hair. The
issue is "long" hair for women and "short" hair for man, a
contrast between the sexes.
2.A
question comes to SEARCH because people observe the "short hair" of
the women in the singing audience. It may be shorter than it could be or than
it may have been at other times or in other cultures, however, there is no
difficulty in distinguishing the women from the men in this audience.
3.I
have done some very quick research on verse 16. The translations have a serious
variation only in one place. The KJV, NKJV, ASV and others say "we have no
such custom" while the RSV, NFV, NASV say "we have no other
practice" (the NASV has a footnote saying "such" is the literal
translation). There is not enough difference between "custom" and
"practice" for any serious discussion. However, there is a real
difference between "no such" and "no other" - the first
refers to what has been discussed and the second could focus on external
practices. The first would suggest that Paul discussed the matter of women
wearing a covering in worship and concludes that this is not a custom or
practice in churches. The second might see Paul as setting up a custom
or practice and allowing no discussion of another or different practice or
custom. I am not a Greek scholar (I have a minor in Greek), but my quick
research has reinforced my conviction that "no such" is the right
translation; that is the literal translation of the words. The other rendering
seems to me to be more commentary than literal translation.
Ch. 20 The Cities of Refuge Ch. 21 Cities and Pasturelands Allotted to Levi
Thesis: The comprehensive provision of cities for the Levites, as seen in Joshua 21, illustrates the abundance of God's forgiveness, which not only absolves us but also fully equips us for a life of service in his name.
Introduction: God's forgiveness transcends mere absolution; it equips us for a life dedicated to his service.
1. The designation of cities of refuge as mentioned in Joshua 20 symbolizes God's provision for forgiveness and protection against the consequences of unintended sins. A. As the cities offered safety for those who committed manslaughter without intent, God's forgiveness envelops us, rescuing us from the eternal consequences of sin (Joshua 20:2-3). B. Just as these cities were accessible to all Israelites, God’s forgiveness is available to everyone who seeks him (Joshua 20:9).
2. The allotment of cities to the Levites in Joshua 21 demonstrates God's intention for us to live in communities that nurture our spiritual growth and service. A. The specific cities given to the Levites were not just residences; they were centers for worship and spiritual instruction, illustrating how God equips his people for service (Joshua 21:2-3). B. Like the Levites, who were distributed throughout Israel to minister, we're called to serve and share God's forgiveness in every sphere of our lives (Joshua 21:41).
3. The completion of God’s promises in providing these cities signifies his faithfulness in fully equipping us for a life of service through his forgiveness. A. The fulfillment of this divine provision underscored God's reliability and the comprehensive nature of his forgiveness, which is both a pardon and an empowerment for service (Joshua 21:43-45). B. As the Levites were integral to the spiritual life of Israel, so are we, forgiven and empowered, crucial to spreading God's message of redemption and forgiveness in the world today.
Conclusion: In the same way that the cities of refuge and the Levitical cities provided safety, community, and a place of service, God's forgiveness offers us a sanctuary from sin, a spiritual family, and a purposeful mission. Let us embrace this comprehensive forgiveness, allowing it not only to absolve us but to also equip us for impactful service in God’s kingdom. As we move forward, may we live in the abundance of God’s forgiveness, demonstrating it in our lives and sharing it with others. How will you let God’s forgiveness transform you into an instrument of his grace and truth in the world?